AIA-2026-0017Courts and legalUnder review

Employment Court found fabricated case law in a litigant’s filings (Cunningham v healthAlliance)

In Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Ltd, the Employment Court found that a self-represented litigant’s filings relied on cases that did not exist, which the Court said may have come from generative AI. It reminded the litigant to check AI output against the courts’ guidelines for non-lawyers.

Severity 1 of 5: Minor. Fabricated citations filed; caught by the Court with a warning and no wider harm reported. How we rate severity
Date it happened
29 August 2025
Added to the register
29 August 2025
Type of AI involved
Generative AI (legal research)
Kind of harm
Misleading information
Last updated
29 October 2026

What happened

In Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Ltd [2025] NZEmpC 191, a self-represented litigant’s filings relied on case law the Employment Court could not find and treated as fabricated. The Court said the information may have been provided by generative artificial intelligence. It declined the litigant’s application and formally reminded them to check AI-generated content, referring to the Guidelines for Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Courts and Tribunals for non-lawyers.

Sources

  1. Cunningham v healthAlliance NZ Ltd [2025] NZEmpC 191 (decision)
    Employment Court, 29 August 2025
  2. Case record
    AI Vortex legal AI risk database, 2025

Change history

  • 30 Oct 2026 Added to the register.

Cite this entry

AI Incidents Aotearoa. (2025). Employment Court found fabricated case law in a litigant’s filings (Cunningham v healthAlliance) (AIA-2026-0017). AI Safety Aotearoa. Retrieved 29 October 2026, from https://aiincidents.nz/register/employment-court-found-fabricated-case-law-in-a-litigants-filings-cunningham-v-healthalliance/

Other formats

Spot a mistake?

Tell us and we’ll check it. Every change is logged.

Suggest a correction

Has this happened to you?

AI Safety Aotearoa has plain-language guides on what to do.

Read the guides